Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer Nitro KG241Y vs Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240: Comparison

Acer Nitro KG241Y and Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 separate most on response time: Acer Nitro KG241Y at 2 ms, Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 at 0.03 ms, 6567% in favour of Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240. Screen Size splits them by another 47%, again favouring Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240. They match on hdr support and panel coating.

Acer Nitro KG241Y (23.8-Inch 1080p VA/IPS/180Hz/1ms VRB/Standard sRGB/Extremely Low Price)
AcerAcer Nitro KG241Y
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 (45-Inch Bendable Curved/Flat WOLED/240Hz/0.03ms/98.5% DCI-P3/DisplayHDR True Black 400)
CorsairCorsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240

Specs

Specification
Acer Nitro KG241Y (23.8-Inch 1080p VA/IPS/180Hz/1ms VRB/Standard sRGB/Extremely Low Price)
Acer Nitro KG241Y
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 (45-Inch Bendable Curved/Flat WOLED/240Hz/0.03ms/98.5% DCI-P3/DisplayHDR True Black 400)
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
BrandAcerCorsair
Model NumberKG241Y (P3bip variant)45WQHD240
Screen Size23.8 in-47%45 in
Resolution1920 x 1080 (Full HD)3440 x 1440 (UWQHD)
Aspect Ratio16:921:9
Refresh Rate180 Hz-25%240 Hz
Response Time2 ms-6567%0.03 ms
Adaptive SyncAMD FreeSyncAMD FreeSync Premium, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible
HDR SupportYesYes
CurvedNoYes
Panel CoatingMatte anti-glareMatte anti-glare
Native Resolution1920x10803440x1440
Max Refresh Rate180 Hz-25%240 Hz
Response Time GtG2 ms0.03 ms
VRR StandardFreeSyncFreeSync Premium
HDR CertificationHDR10 signal onlyDisplayHDR True Black 400
Color Depth8-bit10-bit
DisplayPort Version1.21.4
SeriesNitro KG241YXeneon Flex
Color Gamut72% NTSC98.5% DCI-P3
Source URLhttps://www.acer.com/us-en/monitors/gaming/nitro-kg1/pdp/UM.QX1AA.305https://www.corsair.com/us/en/p/monitors/cm-9030001-na/corsair-xeneon-flex-45wqhd240-45-inch-oled-3440-x1440-240hz-refresh-rate-bendable-gaming-monitor-cm-9030001-na

Verdict

Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240

8.7 / 10 Expert Rating

A genuinely innovative ultrawide OLED monitor whose bendable design solves the flat-versus-curved tradeoff better than any competitor.

More comparisons in Monitors