Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
AMD FX 6100 vs Intel Celeron G6900: Comparison
AMD FX 6100 and Intel Celeron G6900 separate most on l2 cache: AMD FX 6100 at 6 MB, Intel Celeron G6900 at 2.5 MB, 58% in favour of AMD FX 6100. L3 Cache splits them by another 50%, again favouring AMD FX 6100. They match on 6 other specifications, including market segment, efficiency cores and smt enabled.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Product Line | Other | Celeron |
| Form Factor | Desktops | Desktop |
| Codename | Zambezi | Alder Lake |
| Release Year | 2011 | 2022 |
| TDP | 95 W | 46 W |
| iGPU | Discrete Graphics Card Required | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | Other | LGA1700 |
| Socket Status | End of Life | Mature |
| Process Node | 32 | 10 nm |
| Performance Cores | 6 | 2 |
| Efficiency Cores | 0 | 0 |
| SMT Enabled | No | No |
| P-Core Base Clock | 3.3 | 3.4 |
| P-Core Boost Clock | 3.9 | 3.8 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 2.5 MB-58% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 4 MB-50% |
| Base Power | 95 | 46 W |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR5 or DDR4 |
| Max Memory Speed | 1866 | 4800 |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| Integrated Graphics | No | Yes |
| Retail Availability | Boxed Retail | Boxed Retail |
| Cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 6 | 2 |
Verdict
Intel Celeron G6900
6.6 / 10 Expert Rating
The Intel Celeron G6900 is a rock-bottom entry chip, fine for the lightest computing tasks and nothing more.