Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB: Comparison

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB separate most on capacity per module: ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 16 GB, SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB at 32 GB, 50% in favor of SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB. Peak Bandwidth splits them by another 33%, again favoring SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB. They match on module count and form factor.

Pick the ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if that matters to you: 17% lower true latency (13.8 ns vs 16.7 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen. Pick the SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB if that matters to you: 2x the capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB), which is what keeps browser tabs, games and editing apps from spilling to the SSD. These kits use different memory generations and do not fit the same motherboard.

Which is better, ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB?

On paper, SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB has the edge on capacity per module, at 32 GB vs ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 16 GB.

What is the main difference between ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB?

The ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB are built for different jobs. The ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ has 17% lower true latency (13.8 ns vs 16.7 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen. The SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB has 2x the capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB), which is what keeps browser tabs, games and editing apps from spilling to the SSD.

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ (16GB DDR4-3200 ECC UDIMM/2Rx8/1.2V/288-Pin/Industrial-Grade)
ADATAADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
SK
SKSK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    –
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    5.3/10

    DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.

  • DDR Generation

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DDR4
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    DDR5

  • Brand

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    SK hynix

  • Part Number

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    HMCG88AEBUA081N

  • Series

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA Industrial
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    SK hynix OEM Memory

  • CAS Latency

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    22Best
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    40-82%

  • RAM Segment

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Industrial/Embedded
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    Desktop DDR5

  • Module Count

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    1

  • Form Factor

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DIMM
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    DIMM

  • Capacity Per Module

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GB-50%
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    32 GBBest

  • Ranks Per Module

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1R
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    2R

  • Rated Speed

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    3200 MT/s
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    4800 MT/sBest

  • True Latency

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    13.8 nsBest
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    16.7 ns-21%

  • Peak Bandwidth

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    25.6 GB/s-33%
    SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB
    38.4 GB/sBest

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 40) and the lower true latency (13.8 ns vs 16.7 ns).

    Choose SK Hynix HMCG88AEBUA081N 32GB if you want the higher capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB) and the higher peak bandwidth (38.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).

    More comparisons in RAM