Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01: Comparison
ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01 separate most on true latency: ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 13.8 ns, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01 at 10.0 ns, 38% in favor of TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01.
Pick the TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01 if that matters to you: 28% lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen. These kits use different memory generations and do not fit the same motherboard.
Which is better, ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01?
On paper, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01 has the edge on true latency, at 10.0 ns vs ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 13.8 ns.
What is the main difference between ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01?
The TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01 is the stronger choice on paper: it has 28% lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- 8.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- TeamGroup
Series
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- T-Force Delta RGB
CAS Latency
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- 30-36%
RAM Segment
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- Desktop DDR5
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- 10.0 nsBest
Warranty
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Limited Lifetime
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- Lifetime, Free Replacement for Non-Human Damage
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01
- –
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 30) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB FF3D532G6000HC30DC01 if you want the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns).
More comparisons in RAM
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Vengeance CMK16GX5M2B5200Z40
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Adata Ao2v48uc8w1 Bhls 8GB
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs OWC 32GB DDR5-4800 ECC UDIMM
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs KLEVV BOLT XR KD4AGU880-36A180C
- ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16




