Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01: Comparison

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01 separate most on capacity per module: ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 16 GB, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01 at 4 GB, 75% in favor of ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. Peak Bandwidth splits them by another 50%, this time favoring TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01.

Pick the ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if that matters to you: 4x the capacity per module (16 GB vs 4 GB), which is what keeps browser tabs, games and editing apps from spilling to the SSD. Pick the TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01 if that matters to you: 28% lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen. Both kits must match your motherboard's memory generation.

Which is better, ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01?

On paper, ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ has the edge on capacity per module, at 16 GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01 at 4 GB.

What is the main difference between ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01?

The ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01 are built for different jobs. The ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ has 4x the capacity per module (16 GB vs 4 GB), which is what keeps browser tabs, games and editing apps from spilling to the SSD. The TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01 has 28% lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    –
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    8.0/10

    DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.

  • DDR Generation

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DDR4
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    DDR4
  • Brand

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    TeamGroup
  • Part Number

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
  • Series

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA Industrial
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    T-Force Delta RGB
  • CAS Latency

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    22-37%
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    16Best
  • RAM Segment

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Industrial/Embedded
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    Desktop DDR4
  • Module Count

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    2
  • Form Factor

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DIMM
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    UDIMM
  • Capacity Per Module

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GBBest
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    4 GB-75%
  • True Latency

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    13.8 ns-38%
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    10.0 nsBest
  • Peak Bandwidth

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    25.6 GB/s-50%
    TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01
    51.2 GB/sBest

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 4 GB).

    Choose TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB TF3D48G3200HC16CDC01 if you want the lower CAS latency (16 vs 22), the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).

    More comparisons in RAM