Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB: Comparison

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB separate most on peak bandwidth: ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 25.6 GB/s, TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB at 48.0 GB/s, 47% in favor of TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB. True Latency splits them by another 15%, again favoring TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB. They match on 6 other specifications, including module count, form factor and buffering.

Pick the TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB if that matters to you: 13% lower true latency (12.0 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen. These kits use different memory generations and do not fit the same motherboard.

Which is better, ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB?

On paper, TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB has the edge on peak bandwidth, at 48.0 GB/s vs ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 25.6 GB/s.

What is the main difference between ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB?

The TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB is the stronger choice on paper: it has 13% lower true latency (12.0 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen. It also has 1.9x the rated speed (6,000 MT/s vs 3,200 MT/s), which raises memory bandwidth.

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ (16GB DDR4-3200 ECC UDIMM/2Rx8/1.2V/288-Pin/Industrial-Grade)
ADATAADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
TwinMOSTwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    –
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    7.3/10

    DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.

  • DDR Generation

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DDR4
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    DDR5

  • Brand

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    TwinMOS

  • Part Number

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    TMD516GB6000U36

  • Series

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA Industrial
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    VOLTX

  • CAS Latency

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    22Best
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    36-64%

  • RAM Segment

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Industrial/Embedded
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    Desktop DDR5

  • Module Count

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    1

  • Form Factor

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DIMM
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    DIMM

  • Buffering

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Unbuffered
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    Unbuffered

  • Total Capacity

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GB
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    16 GB

  • Capacity Per Module

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GB
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    16 GB

  • Kit Type

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Single Module
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    Single Module

  • Rated Speed

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    3200 MT/s
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    6000 MT/sBest

  • True Latency

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    13.8 ns-15%
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    12.0 nsBest

  • Rated Voltage

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1.2 V
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    1.1 V

  • Peak Bandwidth

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    25.6 GB/s-47%
    TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB
    48.0 GB/sBest

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 36), the higher total capacity (16 GB vs 16 GB) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).

    Choose TwinMOS TMD516GB6000U36 16GB if you want the lower true latency (12.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (48.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).

    More comparisons in RAM