Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK: Comparison

ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK separate most on peak bandwidth: ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 25.6 GB/s, V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK at 96.0 GB/s, 73% in favor of V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK. True Latency splits them by another 38%, again favoring V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK. They match on capacity per module and warranty.

Pick the V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK if that matters to you: 28% lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen. These kits use different memory generations and do not fit the same motherboard.

Which is better, ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK?

On paper, V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK has the edge on peak bandwidth, at 96.0 GB/s vs ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ at 25.6 GB/s.

What is the main difference between ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK?

The V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK is the stronger choice on paper: it has 28% lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns), so it responds faster, which shows up in games on Ryzen.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    –
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    8.3/10

    DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.

  • DDR Generation

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DDR4
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    DDR5
  • Brand

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    V-Color
  • Part Number

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    TMXSAL1660830KWK
  • Series

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA Industrial
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    Manta XSky RGB
  • CAS Latency

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    22Best
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    30-36%
  • RAM Segment

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Industrial/Embedded
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    Desktop DDR5
  • Module Count

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    2
  • Form Factor

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DIMM
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    Desktop DIMM
  • Capacity Per Module

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GB
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    16 GB
  • True Latency

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    13.8 ns-38%
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    10.0 nsBest
  • Warranty

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Limited Lifetime
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    Limited Lifetime
  • Peak Bandwidth

    ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    25.6 GB/s-73%
    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    96.0 GB/sBest

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose ADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 30) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).

    Choose V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK if you want the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (96.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).

    Price comparison

    RetailerADATA Industrial AD4U3200716G22-BADZV-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    V-Color Manta XSky RGB TMXSAL1660830KWK

    7.7 / 10 Expert Rating

    Same excellent CL30/6000MT/s performance as V-Color's XFinity kit in a different RGB housing, pick based on looks.

    More comparisons in RAM