Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA200 vs XPG MARS 980 PRO: Comparison

Acer FA200 and XPG MARS 980 PRO separate most on sequential write: Acer FA200 at 6,200 MB/s, XPG MARS 980 PRO at 13,000 MB/s, 52% in favor of XPG MARS 980 PRO. Sequential Read splits them by another 49%, again favoring XPG MARS 980 PRO. They match on 4 other specifications, including drive type, form factor and nand layers.

Which is better, Acer FA200 or XPG MARS 980 PRO?

On paper, XPG MARS 980 PRO has the edge on sequential write, at 13,000 MB/s vs Acer FA200 at 6,200 MB/s.

What is the main difference between Acer FA200 and XPG MARS 980 PRO?

The XPG MARS 980 PRO is the faster drive, with a Speed Score of 9.7 against 6.6.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA200
    6.6/10-32%
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    9.7/10Best

    How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.

  • Brand

    Acer FA200
    Acer
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    XPG
  • Model Number

    Acer FA200
    Acer FA200
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
  • Series

    Acer FA200
    FA200
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    MARS 980 PRO
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA200
    Internal
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA200
    PCIe 4.0 x4
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    PCIe 5.0 x4
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA200
    M.2 2280
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    M.2 2280
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA200
    7200 MB/s-49%
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    14000 MB/s
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA200
    6200 MB/s-52%
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    13000 MB/s
  • Controller

    Acer FA200
    MAP1602A
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    SM2508
  • Controller Vendor

    Acer FA200
    Maxio
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    Silicon Motion
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA200
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    DRAM
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA200
    QLC
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    TLC
  • NAND Layers

    Acer FA200
    232
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    232
  • Warranty

    Acer FA200
    5 Years
    XPG MARS 980 PRO
    5 Years

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA200 if you want the higher NAND layers (232 vs 232).

    Choose XPG MARS 980 PRO if you want the higher speed score (9.7 vs 6.6), the higher sequential read (14000 MB/s vs 7200 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (13000 MB/s vs 6200 MB/s).

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA200XPG MARS 980 PRO
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    More comparisons in SSDs

    Compare Acer FA200 with