Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Akasa AK-455 vs Corsair XTM50: Comparison
Akasa AK-455 and Corsair XTM50 separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-455 at 2.4 W/mK, Corsair XTM50 at 13.5 W/mK, 82% in favour of Corsair XTM50. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Metal Oxide/Ceramic | Metal-Oxide (zinc oxide, per Corsair) |
| Brand | Akasa | Corsair |
| Model | Akasa AK-455 | Corsair XTM50 , XTM50 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 2.4 W/mK-82% | 13.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1.5g and 5g syringes | 5g tube with applicator |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU General Cooling | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Long shelf stability before application; no in-use interval published | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Applicator Included | Spatula | Stencil |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Akasa AK-455 vs SilverStone TF02
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Corsair XTM50
- Akasa AK-455 vs Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Akasa AK-455 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Akasa AK-455 vs Thermalright TF7