Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Akasa AK-455 vs Gelid GC1: Comparison
Akasa AK-455 and Gelid GC1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-455 at 2.4 W/mK, Gelid GC1 at 8.5 W/mK, 72% in favour of Gelid GC1. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Metal Oxide/Ceramic | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Akasa | Gelid |
| Model | Akasa AK-455 | Gelid GC1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 2.4 W/mK-72% | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1.5g and 5g syringes | ~3.5g syringe |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU General Cooling | Everyday CPU/GPU Cooler Installs |
| Reapplication Interval | Long shelf stability before application; no in-use interval published | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Akasa AK-455 vs SilverStone TF02
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455
- Akasa AK-455 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Akasa AK-455 vs Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Gelid GC1
- Akasa AK-455 vs Thermalright TF7