Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Akasa AK-455 vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut: Comparison
Akasa AK-455 and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-455 at 2.4 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut at 73 W/mK, 97% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Metal Oxide/Ceramic | Liquid Metal (Gallium-based) |
| Brand | Akasa | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Akasa AK-455 | Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut , Conductonaut |
| Thermal Conductivity | 2.4 W/mK-97% | 73 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive (short-circuit risk) |
| Package Size | 1.5g and 5g syringes | 1g syringe |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU General Cooling | Delidded-Direct-Die (experienced builders only) |
| Reapplication Interval | Long shelf stability before application; no in-use interval published | Long-lasting but requires careful reapplication |
| Safety Notes | None | Reacts with aluminum; do not use on bare aluminum coldplates or near exposed components |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Liquid Metal |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455
- Akasa AK-455 vs SilverStone TF02
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Akasa AK-455 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Akasa AK-455 vs Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK