Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Akasa AK-455 vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet: Comparison
Akasa AK-455 and Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-455 at 2.4 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet at 40.7 W/mK, 94% in favour of Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Metal Oxide/Ceramic | Graphene Pad |
| Brand | Akasa | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Akasa AK-455 | Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet , KryoSheet |
| Thermal Conductivity | 2.4 W/mK-94% | 40.7 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive |
| Package Size | 1.5g and 5g syringes | 24x12mm to 50x50mm sheets, 0.2mm thick |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU General Cooling | High-end CPU/GPU (high-wattage GPUs especially) |
| Reapplication Interval | Long shelf stability before application; no in-use interval published | Reusable across multiple mounts |
| Safety Notes | None | Electrically conductive; keep clear of exposed board components |
| Applicator Included | Spatula | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Akasa AK-455 vs SilverStone TF02
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455
- Akasa AK-455 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Akasa AK-455 vs Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK