Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Halnziye HY-880: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Halnziye HY-880 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Halnziye HY-880 at 5.15 W/mK, 39% in favour of Arctic MX-4. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based/Metal Oxide |
| Brand | Arctic | Halnziye |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | Halnziye HY-880 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 5.15 W/mK-39% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 1g single-use packs (also 30g tubes) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Budget CPU/GPU/Console/LED Cooling |
| Reapplication Interval | Up to 8 years | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Halnziye HY-880
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-4 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic Silver Ceramique 2 vs Halnziye HY-880