Arctic TP-3
- Model:
- Arctic TP-3
- Compound Type:
- Silicone-Based Pad
- Thermal Conductivity:
- ~6.2 W/mK (commonly cited
- Electrical Conductivity:
- Non-Conductive
- Package Size:
- 100x100mm and 200x100mm sheets
- Recommended Use:
- Mainstream CPU/GPU (general-purpose gap-filling)
- Reapplication Interval:
- Long-term stable
- Safety Notes:
- None
Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Manufacturer: Arctic Last updated: September 10, 2026
Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK) Review
Arctic's approach with TP-3 is the same as MX-4 in their paste lineup, don't chase the highest number, just be the reliable budget default. At a commonly cited 6.2 W/mK, it's the lowest-conductivity pad in our catalog, and that's fine for what it's actually built to do.
Arctic's approach with TP-3 is the same as MX-4 in their paste lineup, don't chase the highest number, just be the reliable budget default. At a commonly cited 6.2 W/mK, it's the lowest-conductivity pad in our catalog, and that's fine for what it's actually built to do.
Thermal Performance and Conductivity
Roughly 6.2 W/mK by common citation, well below every other pad here. This isn't the pad you reach for on a hot GPU die, it's the pad you reach for on a gap that just needs bridging.
Compound Type and Composition
Silicone-based, non-conductive, straightforward.
Application and Consistency
The standout feature here is that TP-3 is stackable without performance loss, so if you need more thickness than one sheet gives you, you can layer it rather than buying a different product. Available in generous 100x100mm and 200x100mm sizes, more sheet for the money than most competitors.
Electrical Safety
Fully non-conductive.
Longevity and Pump-Out Resistance
No reapplication needed, standard for pads.
Comparison to Sibling Products
Against Thermalright Odyssey or Gelid GP-Extreme, covered elsewhere on this site, TP-3 loses on conductivity by roughly half but wins on price and sheet size, you're getting more material for less money. Against Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m, this isn't really a fair fight, TP-3 isn't trying to compete on performance.
Who This Pad Is Actually For
Winner for: cheap, generous-sized gap-filling where conductivity isn't the priority.
General-purpose gap-filling on components that don't run especially hot.
Builds needing a lot of material at a low price, thanks to the large sheet sizes and stackability.
Not for: GPU VRAM/VRM or anything running hot enough to actually need higher conductivity.
Pending Verification
Thermal Conductivity: ~6.2 W/mK is commonly cited; confirm against Arctic's current datasheet.
Specifications
Identity and form
| Brand | Arctic |
|---|---|
| Model | Arctic TP-3 , TP-3 |
Cure and durability
| Pump-Out Resistance | High |
|---|
| Compound Type | Silicone-Based Pad |
|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 6.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating |
| Package Size | 100x100mm and 200x100mm sheets, 0.5/1.0/1.5mm, stackable |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (general-purpose gap-filling) |
| Reapplication Interval | Long-term stable, not a wear item |
| Safety Notes | None |
| Paste Segment | Pad |
Expert Review
Reviewed by Burooj Alam. Rated by us, not by users.
Best for
- General-purpose gap-filling on components that don't run especially hot.
- Builds needing a lot of material at a low price, thanks to the large sheet sizes and stackability.
Not for
- GPU VRAM/VRM or anything running hot enough to actually need higher conductivity.
FAQs
What are the key specifications of the Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK)?
The Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK) is a thermal paste from Arctic. Key specs: Compound Type Silicone-Based Pad, Thermal Conductivity 6.2, Electrical Conductivity Non-Conductive, Package Size 100x100mm and 200x100mm sheets, 0.5/1.0/1.5mm, stackable, Recommended Use Mainstream CPU/GPU (general-purpose gap-filling).
Will the Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK) work with my current setup?
The Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK) lists Thermal Conductivity is 6.2. Check that against the hardware you already own before buying, since this is the field that most often decides whether a part fits.
Who is the Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK) best suited to?
It suits general-purpose gap-filling on components that don't run especially hot., builds needing a lot of material at a low price, thanks to the large sheet sizes and stackability..
What are the drawbacks of the Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK)?
It is a poor fit for gpu vram/vrm or anything running hot enough to actually need higher conductivity..
Compare and read more
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK) vs Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK)
- Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 (Silver-Based/5g Syringe/Spreader Card Included) vs Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK)
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste (Non-Conductive/6.7 W/mK/High-end CPU/GPU) vs Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK)
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/High-end CPU/GPU) vs Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK)
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste (Gallium Alloy/Conductive/High-end CPU/GPU) vs Arctic TP-3 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Commonly Cited ~6.2 W/mK)