Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

G-Wolves HTS Pro vs Zowie (BenQ) Zowie ZA13-C: Comparison

G-Wolves HTS Pro and Zowie (BenQ) Zowie ZA13-C separate most on weight: G-Wolves HTS Pro at 55, Zowie (BenQ) Zowie ZA13-C at 79, 44% in favour of G-Wolves HTS Pro. They match on connectivity and grip type.

G-Wolves HTS Pro (Wired/Ambidextrous/Symmetrical Low-Profile/55g/PAW3395 Sensor up to 26,000 DPI/1000Hz/Optical Switches)
G-WolvesG-Wolves HTS Pro
Zowie ZA13-C (Wired/Ambidextrous Symmetrical/79g/3360 Sensor up to 3,200 DPI/1000Hz/Driverless/Mechanical Switches/No RGB)
ZowieZowie (BenQ) Zowie ZA13-C

Specs

Specification
G-Wolves HTS Pro (Wired/Ambidextrous/Symmetrical Low-Profile/55g/PAW3395 Sensor up to 26,000 DPI/1000Hz/Optical Switches)
G-Wolves HTS Pro
Zowie ZA13-C (Wired/Ambidextrous Symmetrical/79g/3360 Sensor up to 3,200 DPI/1000Hz/Driverless/Mechanical Switches/No RGB)
Zowie (BenQ) Zowie ZA13-C
BrandG-WolvesZowie (BenQ)
ConnectivityWiredWired
Grip TypeAmbidextrousAmbidextrous
ModelHTS ProZA13-C
ShapeSymmetrical, Low-Profile ShellSymmetrical, taller front hump
Polling Rate1000 Hz125/500/1000Hz
Weight5579-44%
SensorPAW3395, up to 26,000 DPIPMW3360, native resolutions to 3,200 DPI
SwitchesOpticalMechanical (Huano)

Verdict

Zowie (BenQ) Zowie ZA13-C

7 / 10 Expert Rating

A comfortable palm-grip pick for loyal Zowie users, though dated sensor specs limit its appeal outside that shape preference.

More comparisons in Gaming Mice