Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Cooler Master MM731 vs G-Wolves HTS Pro: Comparison
Cooler Master MM731 vs G-Wolves HTS Pro weight compared
On weight the spread is 12%, Cooler Master MM731 49 g against G-Wolves HTS Pro 55 g, so Cooler Master MM731 takes it. Sensor model is not the same on both, PixArt PAW3370, up to 19,000 DPI on the Cooler Master MM731 versus PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI on the G-Wolves HTS Pro. Connectivity is not the same on both, Wireless , Bluetooth on the Cooler Master MM731 versus Wired on the G-Wolves HTS Pro. They differ on shape too, Symmetrical, honeycomb on the Cooler Master MM731 versus Symmetrical, Low-Profile Shell on the G-Wolves HTS Pro.
Who each one is for
Buy the Cooler Master MM731 for budget shoppers chasing sub-50g wireless weight and ambidextrous claw and fingertip grip users, though it is not built for buyers who dislike honeycomb/vented shells and palm grip users wanting a fuller shell. Take the G-Wolves HTS Pro for fingertip-grip FPS players who specifically want a low-profile, flat shell shape. This mouse's design is purpose-built for that grip style. It is not the one for palm or claw grip players. A taller-profile mouse like the Glorious Model O 2 Wired, covered elsewhere on this site, better suits those grip styles. Our rating of the Cooler Master MM731 (8/10): one of the best value-for-weight wireless mice available; it just lacks the sensor polish of pricier flagships.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: polling rate, grip type and switch type are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Cooler Master MM731
- Cooler Master
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- G-Wolves
Connectivity
- Cooler Master MM731
- Wireless (2.4GHz), Bluetooth
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- Wired
Grip Type
- Cooler Master MM731
- Ambidextrous
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- Ambidextrous
Model
- Cooler Master MM731
- MM731
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- HTS Pro
Shape
- Cooler Master MM731
- Symmetrical, honeycomb
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- Symmetrical, Low-Profile Shell
Sensor Model
- Cooler Master MM731
- PixArt PAW3370, up to 19,000 DPI
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI
Polling Rate
- Cooler Master MM731
- 1000 Hz
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- 1000 Hz
Weight
- Cooler Master MM731
- 49 gBest
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- 55 g-12%
Switch Type
- Cooler Master MM731
- Optical
- G-Wolves HTS Pro
- Optical
Which one should you pick?
Choose Cooler Master MM731 if you want the higher polling rate (1000 Hz vs 1000 Hz) and the lower weight (49 g vs 55 g).
Choose G-Wolves HTS Pro if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Cooler Master MM731 | G-Wolves HTS Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Cooler Master MM731
8 / 10 Expert Rating
One of the best value-for-weight wireless mice available; it just lacks the sensor polish of pricier flagships.