Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Predator GM7000 vs Samsung 960 EVO: Comparison
Acer Predator GM7000 and Samsung 960 EVO separate most on sequential write: Acer Predator GM7000 at 6700, Samsung 960 EVO at 1900, 72% in favour of Acer Predator GM7000. Sequential Read splits them by another 57%, again favouring Acer Predator GM7000.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Acer | Samsung |
| Model Number | GM7000 | 960 EVO |
| Series | Predator GM7000 | 960 EVO |
| Sequential Read | 7400 | 3200-57% |
| Sequential Write | 6700 | 1900-72% |
| NAND Type | TLC with DRAM Cache | Samsung V-NAND TLC |
| Warranty | 5 Years | 3 Years |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe | PCIe 3.0 x4, NVMe |
| Capacity Options | 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | 250GB, 500GB, 1TB |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer Predator GM7000 | Samsung 960 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Samsung | View on Samsung |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Samsung 960 EVO
7.5 / 10 Expert Rating
A historically notable mainstream NVMe drive that's now thoroughly outclassed by modern budget options.