Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Arctic MX-5: Comparison
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste and Arctic MX-5 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste at 6.7 W/mK, Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, 21% in favour of Arctic MX-5. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Arctic |
| Model | Alphacool Apex 2 | Arctic MX-5 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 6.7 W/mK-21% | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g syringe | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (developed with Halnziye for CPUs, GPU hotspots, overclocking systems, workstations and servers) | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers |
| Safety Notes | Causes serious eye irritation; toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects. Wear protective gloves and eye protection and wash hands thoroughly after use. | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste | Arctic MX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Zalman ZM-STC10
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut