Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Rosewill RCX-TC001 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, Rosewill RCX-TC001 at 2.4 W/mK, 72% in favour of Arctic MX-5.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | Rosewill |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | RCX-TC001 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 2.4 W/mK-72% |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | 5g |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-5 | Rosewill RCX-TC001 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Rosewill RCX-TC001




