Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-4: Comparison
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and Arctic MX-4 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK at 17.8 W/mK, Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, 52% in favour of Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Silicone-Based Pad | Carbon-Based |
| Brand | Alphacool | Arctic |
| Model | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 17.8 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK-52% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Arctic MX-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs JunPus JP-DX1
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet




