Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme: Comparison
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK at 17.8 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme at 73 W/mK, 76% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Silicone-Based Pad | Liquid Metal |
| Brand | Alphacool | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme , Conductonaut Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 17.8 W/mK-76% | 73 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive |
| Package Size | 120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet | 1g syringe |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU | Delidded-Direct-Die (GPU and vertical mounting) |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Liquid Metal |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs JunPus JP-DX1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermalright TF4
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm




