Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs EK-TIM Ectotherm: Comparison

Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and EK-TIM Ectotherm separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK at 17.8 W/mK, EK-TIM Ectotherm at 8.5 W/mK, 52% in favour of Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK.

Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/High-end CPU/GPU)
AlphacoolAlphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
EK-TIM Ectotherm (Metal Oxide/Ceramic Hybrid/Non-Conductive/Low-Viscosity Water Block Formula)
EK-TIMEK-TIM Ectotherm

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/High-end CPU/GPU)
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
EK-TIM Ectotherm (Metal Oxide/Ceramic Hybrid/Non-Conductive/Low-Viscosity Water Block Formula)
EK-TIM Ectotherm
Compound TypeSilicone-Based PadMetal Oxide/Ceramic Hybrid
BrandAlphacoolEKWB
ModelAlphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mKEK-TIM Ectotherm
Thermal Conductivity17.8 W/mK8.5 W/mK-52%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet1g and 5g syringes
Recommended UseHigh-end CPU/GPUCustom Loop/AIO Builders, GPU Water Blocks
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerAlphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mKEK-TIM Ectotherm
Alphacool Shop (EU)View on Alphacool Shop (EU)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste