Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Arctic MX-4: Comparison
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Arctic MX-4 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, 23% in favour of Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Arctic |
| Model | Alphacool Eisschicht 11W/mK | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11.0 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK-23% |
| Package Size | 95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level components | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) |
| Pump-Out Resistance | High | Medium |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
| Spec Score | 7.7 | 6.1 |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK