Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1: Comparison
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Noctua NT-H1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Noctua NT-H1 at 12.8 W/mK, 14% in favour of Noctua NT-H1.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Noctua |
| Model | Alphacool Eisschicht 11W/mK | Noctua NT-H1 , NT-H1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11.0 W/mK-14% | 12.8 W/mK |
| Package Size | 95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on | 3.5g / 10g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level components | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (Noctua's original flagship paste, superseded by NT-H2) |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Arctic MX-7 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano




