Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Arctic MX-6: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Arctic MX-6 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, 23% in favour of Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK.

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
AlphacoolAlphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
ArcticArctic MX-6

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
BrandAlphacoolArctic
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKArctic MX-6 , MX-6
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK8.5 W/mK-23%
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)
Pump-Out ResistanceHighHigh
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste
Spec Score7.76.8

More comparisons in Thermal Paste