Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Honeywell PTM7950: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Honeywell PTM7950 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Honeywell PTM7950 at 8.5 W/mK, 23% in favour of Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK. They match on pump-out resistance and paste segment.

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
AlphacoolAlphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Honeywell PTM7950 (Phase-Change Pad/Non-Conductive/Reapplication-Free for Repeated Thermal Cycles)
HoneywellHoneywell PTM7950

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Honeywell PTM7950 (Phase-Change Pad/Non-Conductive/Reapplication-Free for Repeated Thermal Cycles)
Honeywell PTM7950
BrandAlphacoolHoneywell
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKHoneywell PTM7950 , PTM7950
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK8.5 W/mK-23%
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left onSheet/pad cut to size (sold by area, not weight)
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsLaptop-Thin-GPU (and builds needing reapplication-free long-term use)
Pump-Out ResistanceHighHigh
Paste SegmentPadPad

More comparisons in Thermal Paste