Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut at 62.5 W/mK, 82% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut. They match on pump-out resistance and paste segment.

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
AlphacoolAlphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut (Carbon Pad/Conductive/Reusable/Commonly Cited ~62.5 W/mK)
Thermal GrizzlyThermal Grizzly Carbonaut

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut (Carbon Pad/Conductive/Reusable/Commonly Cited ~62.5 W/mK)
Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut
BrandAlphacoolThermal Grizzly
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKThermal Grizzly Carbonaut , Carbonaut
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK-82%62.5 W/mK
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on31x25x0.2mm / 32x32x0.2mm / 38x38x0.2mm sheets
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsHigh-end CPU/GPU (also consoles and frequent cooler remounts)
Pump-Out ResistanceHighHigh
Paste SegmentPadPad

More comparisons in Thermal Paste