Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut at 12.5 W/mK, 12% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut.

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
AlphacoolAlphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut (Silicone-Based/12.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Premium Enthusiast and Overclocking Pick)
Thermal GrizzlyThermal Grizzly Kryonaut

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut (Silicone-Based/12.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Premium Enthusiast and Overclocking Pick)
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
BrandAlphacoolThermal Grizzly
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKThermal Grizzly Kryonaut , Kryonaut
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK-12%12.5 W/mK
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on1g / 5.55g / 11.1g tubes
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsHigh-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking)
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste