Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme at 14.2 W/mK, 23% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme.

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme (Metal Oxide/Ceramic/Non-Conductive/14.2 W/mK/Paste-Safe Extreme OC)
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
BrandAlphacoolThermal Grizzly
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKThermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK-23%14.2 W/mK
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on1g, 2g, 5.55g/9g
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsExtreme Overclocking, High-end CPU/GPU
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste