Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme: Comparison
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme at 14.2 W/mK, 23% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Alphacool Eisschicht 11W/mK | Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11.0 W/mK-23% | 14.2 W/mK |
| Package Size | 95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on | 1g, 2g, 5.55g/9g |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level components | Extreme Overclocking, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Coollaboratory Liquid Extreme
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano




