Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet at 40.7 W/mK, 73% in favour of Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet. They match on pump-out resistance and paste segment.

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
AlphacoolAlphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet (Graphene Pad/Conductive/Reusable/Commonly Cited ~40.7 W/mK)
Thermal GrizzlyThermal Grizzly KryoSheet

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet (Graphene Pad/Conductive/Reusable/Commonly Cited ~40.7 W/mK)
Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
BrandAlphacoolThermal Grizzly
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKThermal Grizzly KryoSheet , KryoSheet
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK-73%40.7 W/mK
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on24x12mm to 50x50mm sheets, 0.2mm thick
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsHigh-end CPU/GPU (high-wattage GPUs especially)
Pump-Out ResistanceHighHigh
Paste SegmentPadPad

More comparisons in Thermal Paste