Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and ID-Cooling ID-TG15 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, ID-Cooling ID-TG15 at 8.5 W/mK, 47% in favour of Alphacool Subzero. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Alphacool | ID-Cooling |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | ID-TG15 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK-47% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 1.5g syringe |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Subzero vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15




