Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme at 12.5 W/mK, 22% in favour of Alphacool Subzero.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Alphacool | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK | 12.5 W/mK-22% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | Sold in cuttable sheet sizes and thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval | Reusable; no reapplication needed unless physically damaged |
| Safety Notes | None | Cut to size with scissors; non-conductive |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Subzero | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Grizzly | View on Thermal Grizzly |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Arctic MX-7 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro