Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and ID-Cooling Frost X45 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, ID-Cooling Frost X45 at 15.2 W/mK, 28% in favour of ID-Cooling Frost X45. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Antec | ID-Cooling |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Frost X45 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK-28% | 15.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 2g or 4g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK




