Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme at 12.5 W/mK, 12% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Antec | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK-12% | 12.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | Sold in cuttable sheet sizes and thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Reusable; no reapplication needed unless physically damaged |
| Safety Notes | None | Cut to size with scissors; non-conductive |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Grizzly | View on Thermal Grizzly |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Arctic MX-7 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme