Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE at 3.195 W/mK, 71% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antec | StarTech.com |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 3.195 W/mK-71% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 5 x 1.5g re-sealable syringes (7.5g total) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU (best suited for CPUs with TDP up to 65W) |
| Safety Notes | None | CE and RoHS certified |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE |
|---|---|---|
| StarTech.com | View on StarTech.com |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE