Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs be quiet! DC2 Pro: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and be quiet! DC2 Pro separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, be quiet! DC2 Pro at 80 W/mK, 93% in favour of be quiet! DC2 Pro.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Liquid Metal |
| Brand | Arctic | be quiet! |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | be quiet! DC2 Pro , DC2 Pro |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-93% | 80 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive (short-circuit risk) |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | Applicator kit (ml/g pending verification) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Delidded-Direct-Die (experienced builders only) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Long-lasting; requires careful reapplication |
| Safety Notes | None | Liquid metal: electrically conductive; do not use near exposed aluminum or bare-die edges |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Liquid Metal |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs be quiet! DC2 Pro
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs be quiet! DC2 Pro
- Arctic MX-2 vs PCCooler EX90



