Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Rosewill RCX-TC001 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Rosewill RCX-TC001 at 2.4 W/mK, 57% in favour of Arctic MX-2. They match on recommended use and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | Rosewill |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | RCX-TC001 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK | 2.4 W/mK-57% |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 5g |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-2 | Rosewill RCX-TC001 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-2 vs PCCooler EX90
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermalright TFX




