Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs StarTech.com StarTech HEATGREASE20: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and StarTech.com StarTech HEATGREASE20 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, StarTech.com StarTech HEATGREASE20 at 1.066 W/mK, 81% in favour of Arctic MX-2. They match on electrical conductivity, recommended use and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | StarTech.com |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | HEATGREASE20 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK | 1.066 W/mK-81% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 20g tube |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | RoHS compliant; Bleed <0.05% at 200°C/24h; Evaporation <0.001% at 200°C/24h |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-2 | StarTech.com StarTech HEATGREASE20 |
|---|---|---|
| StarTech.com | View on StarTech.com | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs StarTech.com StarTech HEATGREASE20
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs StarTech.com StarTech HEATGREASE20
- Arctic MX-2 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45