Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-2 vs Zalman ZM-STC10: Comparison

Arctic MX-2 and Zalman ZM-STC10 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Zalman ZM-STC10 at 11.5 W/mK, 51% in favour of Zalman ZM-STC10. They match on electrical conductivity, recommended use and paste segment.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-2 (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Budget Legacy Compound)
Arctic MX-2
Zalman ZM-STC10 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/2g Syringe/11.5 W/mK)
Zalman ZM-STC10
BrandArcticZalman
ModelArctic MX-2ZM-STC10
Thermal Conductivity5.6 W/mK-51%11.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g, 30g, 65g2g syringe (110 x 23 x 14mm)
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPUMainstream CPU/GPU
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-2Zalman ZM-STC10
ZalmanView on Zalman
AquatuningView on Aquatuning

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste