Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano at 11 W/mK, 23% in favour of Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Nano-Diamond Particle Based |
| Brand | Arctic | Cooler Master |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano , MasterGel Maker Nano |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-23% | 11 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 1.5g / 4g tubes with flat-nozzle applicator |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) |
| Reapplication Interval | Up to 8 years | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano
- Arctic MX-4 vs Zalman ZM-STC10
- Arctic MX-4 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad