Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-4 vs Zalman ZM-STC10: Comparison

Arctic MX-4 and Zalman ZM-STC10 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Zalman ZM-STC10 at 11.5 W/mK, 26% in favour of Zalman ZM-STC10. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Arctic MX-4 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Proven Budget Legacy Pick/98,000+ Positive Reviews)
ArcticArctic MX-4
Zalman ZM-STC10 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/2g Syringe/11.5 W/mK)
ZalmanZalman ZM-STC10

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-4 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Proven Budget Legacy Pick/98,000+ Positive Reviews)
Arctic MX-4
Zalman ZM-STC10 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/2g Syringe/11.5 W/mK)
Zalman ZM-STC10
BrandArcticZalman
ModelArctic MX-4 , MX-4ZM-STC10
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK-26%11.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes2g syringe (110 x 23 x 14mm)
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget)Mainstream CPU/GPU
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-4Zalman ZM-STC10
ZalmanView on Zalman
AquatuningView on Aquatuning

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste