Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Coollaboratory Liquid Pro: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Coollaboratory Liquid Pro separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Coollaboratory Liquid Pro at 82 W/mK, 90% in favour of Coollaboratory Liquid Pro.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Liquid Metal |
| Brand | Arctic | Coollaboratory |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | Coollaboratory Liquid Pro , Liquid Pro |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-90% | 82 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 1g syringe with cleaning kit |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Delidded-Direct-Die (extreme overclocking) |
| Reapplication Interval | Up to 8 years | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | Liquid metal: electrically conductive; do not use near exposed aluminum or bare-die edges |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Liquid Metal |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Coollaboratory Liquid Pro
- Arctic MX-4 vs T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Coollaboratory Liquid Pro