Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-4 vs T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad: Comparison

Arctic MX-4 and T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad at 14.5 W/mK, 41% in favour of T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-4 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Proven Budget Legacy Pick/98,000+ Positive Reviews)
Arctic MX-4
T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/14.5 W/mK)
T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad
Compound TypeCarbon-BasedSilicone-Based Pad
BrandArcticT-Global Technology
ModelArctic MX-4 , MX-4TG-A1450
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK-41%14.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubesSold in multiple sheet sizes (e.g. 98x148mm, 100x100mm) and thicknesses (0.5mm-2.0mm)
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget)High-end CPU/GPU, VRM and SSD cooling
Reapplication IntervalUp to 8 yearsNo reapplication needed under normal use
Safety NotesNoneNon-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-4T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad
T-Global TechnologyView on T-Global Technology
AmazonView on Amazon
DigiKeyView on DigiKey

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste