Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Supreme: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Supreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Supreme at 4.5 W/mK, 47% in favour of Arctic MX-4. They match on electrical conductivity, curing and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Arctic | Gelid Solutions |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | GC-Supreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 4.5 W/mK-47% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 7g tube |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-flammable, non-toxic, safe for skin contact per manufacturer |
| Curing | Non-Curing | Non-Curing |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Supreme
- Arctic MX-4 vs T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-4 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad