Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs PCCooler GM-6: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and PCCooler GM-6 differ on compound type: Arctic MX-4 at Carbon-Based, PCCooler GM-6 at Nano-diamond compound (classification pending verification). They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Nano-diamond compound (classification pending verification) |
| Brand | Arctic | PCCooler |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | PCCooler GM-6 |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 4g tube |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-4 vs T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-4 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs PCCooler GM-6