Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs PCCooler GT-10: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and PCCooler GT-10 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, PCCooler GT-10 at 13.6 W/mK, 38% in favour of PCCooler GT-10. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Nano-diamond compound (classification pending verification) |
| Brand | Arctic | PCCooler |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | PCCooler GT-10 (2g) |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-37% | 13.6 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 2g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs PCCooler GT-10
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs PCCooler GT-10
- Arctic MX-4 vs T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad