Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum at 10.2 W/mK, 17% in favour of Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | Prolimatech |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | PK-1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-17% | 10.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 1.5g, 5g, 30g syringe options |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-electronically conductive, non-corrosive |
| Pump-Out Resistance | Medium | High |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
| Spec Score | 6.1 | 4.6 |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-4 | Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Prolimatech (Manufacturer) | View on Prolimatech (Manufacturer) | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-4 vs T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum
- Arctic MX-4 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad