Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK at 7 W/mK, 18% in favour of Arctic MX-6. They match on electrical conductivity and pump-out resistance.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK (Pad/Non-Conductive/100x100x1.0mm)
Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
BrandArcticPhobya
ModelArctic MX-6 , MX-6Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mk
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK7 W/mK-18%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes100 x 100 x 1.0mm sheet, cuttable to size; also sold in other thicknesses
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Mainstream CPU/GPU; Phobya markets it as able to match high-end thermal compounds for VRAM, VRM, and North/Southbridge cooling
Pump-Out ResistanceHighHigh
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad
Spec Score6.85.8

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-6Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
NeweggView on Newegg

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste