Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-6: Comparison
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and Arctic MX-6 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK at 17.8 W/mK, Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, 52% in favour of Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Silicone-Based Pad | Carbon-Based |
| Brand | Alphacool | Arctic |
| Model | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Arctic MX-6 , MX-6 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 17.8 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK-52% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet | 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds) |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Arctic MX-6 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs JunPus JP-DX1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Halnziye HY-810
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet




