Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic Silver 5 vs Thermalright TF8: Comparison

Arctic Silver 5 and Thermalright TF8 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic Silver 5 at 8.9 W/mK, Thermalright TF8 at 13.8 W/mK, 36% in favour of Thermalright TF8. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Thermalright TF8 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/High-Density Filler Paste/13.8 W/mK)
ThermalrightThermalright TF8

Specs

Specification
Arctic Silver 5 (Metal-Based/Non-Conductive/8.9 W/mK/200-Hour Cure Period)
Arctic Silver 5
Thermalright TF8 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/High-Density Filler Paste/13.8 W/mK)
Thermalright TF8
BrandArctic SilverThermalright
ModelArctic Silver 5TF8
Thermal Conductivity8.9 W/mK-36%13.8 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size3.5g syringe (also 12g)1.2g, 2g, 5.8g, 12.8g syringe options
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPUHigh-end CPU/GPU
Safety NotesRequires ~200-hour burn-in period to reach rated performanceElectrically non-conductive, harmless per manufacturer
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerArctic Silver 5Thermalright TF8
Thermalright (Manufacturer)View on Thermalright (Manufacturer)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste